Michigan Central Railroad Company, et al., Complainants, vs. Perry F. Powers, Auditor General, Defendant; Defendant's Abstract of Pleadings and Proofs ... by Charles Austin Blair
---------------------------------------------------------------
Author: Charles Austin Blair
Page Count: 178 pages
Published Date: 13 Sep 2013
Publisher: Rarebooksclub.com
Publication Country: United States
Language: English
ISBN: 9781236996343
File Name: Michigan.Central.Railroad.Company,.et.al.,.Complainants,.vs..Perry.F..Powers,.Auditor.General,.Defendant;.Defendant's.Abstract.of.Pleadings.and.Proofs.....pdf
Download Link: Michigan Central Railroad Company, et al., Complainants, vs. Perry F. Powers, Auditor General, Defendant; Defendant's Abstract of Pleadings and Proofs ...
---------------------------------------------------------------
This historic book may have numerous typos and missing text. Purchasers can usually download a free scanned copy of the original book (without typos) from the publisher. Not indexed. Not illustrated. 1904 edition. Excerpt: ...as elements of nonphysical value.' (4679) JOHNSON, cross. Q. I note on page 105, "American Railway Transportation," you say: n "A comparison of the freight-revenue line on the chart with the line for the operating expenses shows that when earnings decline rapidly it is not possible to curtail operating expenses to an equal degree. Likewise, when there is a large increase in earnings the operating expenses, including the large expenditures for betterments, do not rise with equal rapidity. A large business is relatively less expensive than a small one." A. That is a correct statement. (4707) GREENE, cross. The non-physical elements of one combination are given as "good will, contracts, leases, trade marks, patents, processes. brands and kindred assets of an established business."--There are other elements of good-will. Referring to Harper Publishing Co.' I said if the mortgage on the physical property was foreclosed, the non-physical would disappear. Those elements enumerated would not be worth anything unless gathered together and used as the organization of going concern.n A man could own patent or secret process who did not own any physical property, and transfer those without reference to physical property. The elements read could exist independent of organization. The brands would be worthless unless going concern had possession. The individual brands could be transferred, but common stock of concern would be worthless. It depends on organization of going concern. ( 37 19) The elements from the document would not disappear on foreclosure of physical property, but would become practically worthless. There are elements of non-physical value different from those referred to. Every business...
Read online Michigan Central Railroad Company, et al., Complainants, vs. Perry F. Powers, Auditor General, Defendant; Defendant's Abstract of Pleadings and Proofs ...
Buy Michigan Central Railroad Company, et al., Complainants, vs. Perry F. Powers, Auditor General, Defendant; Defendant's Abstract of Pleadings and Proofs ...
Download and read Michigan Central Railroad Company, et al., Complainants, vs. Perry F. Powers, Auditor General, Defendant; Defendant's Abstract of Pleadings and Proofs ... ebook, pdf, djvu, epub, mobi, fb2, zip, rar, torrent
Download to iPad/iPhone/iOS, B&N nook Michigan Central Railroad Company, et al., Complainants, vs. Perry F. Powers, Auditor General, Defendant; Defendant's Abstract of Pleadings and Proofs ...